case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or even the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
It is usually important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual size of service practically violates the entire service composition like a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming this kind of benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention of your law nor on the equity. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession with the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to become decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made clear that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-discipline duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners could find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, though it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it can be actually very vague about whether the 90-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based over the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held on the ninety-working day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The regulation as established in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, It is additionally a very well-recognized proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.
Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually effectively-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Executing a case regulation search might be as easy as moving into specific keywords or citation into a search engine. There are, however, certain websites that facilitate case law searches, such as:
Problems or Errors In case you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a poor link or possibly a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Heart.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not get more info making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this factor for interim custody of the subject premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners might request remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more